Would there be a notable difference in 8 x 10s pics done with a 4.0 mp camera and one done with a 6.0 mp camera?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not really, you can only print as good as your printer 4meg is good for 8x10, 6.00 would be good for REALLY REALLY big prints

Would there be a notable difference in 8 x 10s pics done with a 4.0 mp camera and one done with a 6.0 mp camera?
Liz is still camera shopping and I mailed her some 8 x 10s I did with my 4.0 ... maybe it's just me, but I thought they turned out very nice. And my camera was 1/4 the price of the 6.0 models. I did an 8 x 10 of this rainbow photo and I was very pleased with how it printed.

How can you take bad pictures.

Those 2 faces are beautiful using any camera, Lisa! Gosh, Gertie is growing like a little Hawaiian weed!!

Barbara

unless you satisfy our grueling demands. We are harsh taskmasters. Unless you are willing to bribe us.

It is great! I got the Nikon Coolpix 5700 before my trip to England, but it is nothing like Glen's. I wish I had waited if the difference is so great!

hahahahhaah CEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE that is the funnies thing yet!!!!! hahahahahahha Im going to start calling it Milo's voom voom haahahhaha!

I didnt have my glasses so my judgement wasnt as good as Glens lol!!!
I'll go take some more GARY!!!!!!!! heeheee
But yes Shot # 2 was glens camera.

Milo's Voom Voommm..lol...ce

I would say that in a heartbeat. But I will agree, the first pic is further away and not in focus. Same shot, same pose, same distance. You're probably have to get Glen to get a picture of you since the dogs probably won't pose that long. I still swear I can tell the pictures apart.

You have to take the same shot from the same distance of the same view.

Having said that, pic number two looks like it was taken by a better camera than the first photo, but that may be becuz it is so much closer in.

Hee hee! I meant to say that earlier...


Julia