AB1634 has been amended. It is worse as the new provisions will create a bureucratic and oversight nigtmare. Neuter spay age is up to 6 mos now. It also now appears to limit permits to one male and one female per household for one litter only! This was supposed to be for non-show dogs but could easily be applied to EVERYBODY. AS IT IS NOW WRITTEN, YOU WILL BE LIMITED TO ONE DOG OF EACH SEX FOR ONE LITTER ONLY. unless of course you're a USDA licensed breeder then have fun! http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1601-1650/ab_1634_bill_20070627_amended_sen_v93.html
If you or your club or rescue or organization has already mailed a letter great. but you need a NEW one to be sent to all the Committee members and Committee consultants with the heading
"We remain adamantly OPPOSED to AB1634 as amended June 27, 2007 and ALL versions"
contact info for the committee http://saveourdogs.net/contactyourrep.html
Stay on point.
These laws do not work.
AB1634 will raise Animal Control and Care costs dramatically statewide as local measures have consistently done
Mandatory pet sterilization laws drive MORE animals into rescue and shelters. In short MORE animals will die.
AB1634 does nothing to address the real reasons animals are abandoned or relinquished and does not address un-owned animal populations such as feral cats
AB 1634 will cost the state millions in lost revenue to dog and cat events and tourism
Encourages smuggling, imports and puppy mills
Cannot be enforced fairly, is unwelcomed by many local governments and is an infringement on the rights of law abiding Californians
Local effort ARE working. Better enforcement of existing statutes and more community outreach and access to afordable veterinary services is the key, not restrictive laws sure to backfire.
don't dwell on good vs bad breeders, politicians don't really care or see much difference frankly. Keep it to ONE page. Make your points concise and firm, And of course tailor it to your organization
Re: amended bill worse, Californians ACT NOW
who is writing these ammendments?
e
what i dont understand
why can they start changing wording and it not have to start over at the bottom of the voting.
If that is the case, then they can reword it so it says you can own a dog/cat and choose to have him/her fixed and right before it passes in to law change the wording to what it is.
I dont understand>
Vicky
Vicky,
Bosco, Bella, Breve' & Holly
http://www.rubarbsoap.com/
Bulldog Club of Greater Seattle
PHOTOS ARE PROPERTY OF LANGAGER BULLDOGS, YOU MUST HAVE WRITTEN PERMISSION FOR ANY USE OF THESE PHOTOS FROM LANGAGERBULLDOG.
re:
Loyd Levine, Judie Mancuso with input from radicals at CVMA
Levine and Mancuso have strong ties to AR extremists