FOR YOU INFORMATION....... 
 Science of Vaccine Damage
 Science of Vaccine Damage
 by Catherine O'Driscoll
 (posted with permission)
 A team at Purdue University 
 School of Veterinary Medicine conducted 
 several studies (1,2) to determine if 
 vaccines can cause changes in the immune 
 system of dogs that might lead to 
 life-threatening immune-mediated diseases. 
 They obviously conducted this research 
 because concern already existed. It was 
 sponsored by the Haywood Foundation which 
 itself was looking for evidence that such 
 changes in the human immune system might also 
 be vaccine induced. It found the evidence.
 The vaccinated, but not the 
 non-vaccinated, dogs in the Purdue studies 
 developed autoantibodies to many of their own 
 biochemicals, including fibronectin, laminin, 
 DNA, albumin, cytochrome C, cardiolipin and 
 collagen.
 This means that the vaccinated 
 dogs -- but not the non-vaccinated dogs-- 
 were attacking their own fibronectin, which 
 is involved in tissue repair, cell 
 multiplication and growth, and 
 differentiation between tissues and organs in 
 a living organism.
 The vaccinated Purdue dogs also 
 developed autoantibodies to laminin, which is 
 involved in many cellular activities 
 including the adhesion, spreading, 
 differentiation, proliferation and movement 
 of cells. Vaccines thus appear to be capable 
 of removing the natural intelligence of 
 cells.
 Autoantibodies to cardiolipin 
 are frequently found in patients with the 
 serious disease systemic lupus erythematosus 
 and also in individuals with other autoimmune 
 diseases. The presence of elevated 
 anti-cardiolipin antibodies is significantly 
 associated with clots within the heart or 
 blood vessels, in poor blood clotting, 
 haemorrhage, bleeding into the skin, foetal 
 loss and neurological conditions.
 The Purdue studies also found 
 that vaccinated dogs were developing 
 autoantibodies to their own collagen. About 
 one quarter of all the protein in the body is 
 collagen. Collagen provides structure to our 
 bodies, protecting and supporting the softer 
 tissues and connecting them with the 
 skeleton. It is no wonder that Canine Health 
 Concern's 1997 study of 4,000 dogs showed a 
 high number of dogs developing mobility 
 problems shortly after they were vaccinated 
 (noted in my 1997 book, What Vets Don't Tell 
 You About Vaccines).
 Perhaps most worryingly, the 
 Purdue studies found that the vaccinated dogs 
 had developed autoantibodies to their own 
 DNA. Did the alarm bells sound? Did the 
 scientific community call a halt to the 
 vaccination program? No. Instead, they stuck 
 their fingers in the air, saying more 
 research is needed to ascertain whether 
 vaccines can cause genetic damage. Meanwhile, 
 the study dogs were found good homes, but no 
 long-term follow-up has been conducted. At 
 around the same time, the American Veterinary 
 Medical Association (AVMA) Vaccine-Associated 
 Feline Sarcoma Task Force initiated several 
 studies to find out why 160,000 cats each 
 year in the USA develop terminal cancer at 
 their vaccine injection sites.(3) The fact 
 that cats can get vaccine-induced cancer has 
 been acknowledged by veterinary bodies around 
 the world, and even the British Government 
 acknowledged it through its Working Group 
 charged with the task of looking into canine 
 and feline vaccines(4) following pressure 
 from Canine Health Concern. What do you 
 imagine was the advice of the AVMA Task 
 Force, veterinary bodies and governments? 
 "Carry on vaccinating until
 we find out why vaccines are 
 killing cats, and which cats are most likely 
 to die."
 In America , in an attempt to 
 mitigate the problem, they're vaccinating 
 cats in the tail or leg so they can amputate 
 when cancer appears. Great advice if it's not 
 your cat amongst the hundreds of thousands on 
 the "oops" list.
 But other species are okay - 
 right? Wrong. In August 2003, the Journal of 
 Veterinary Medicine carried an Italian study 
 which showed that dogs also develop 
 vaccine-induced cancers at their injection 
 sites.(5) We already know that vaccine-site 
 cancer is a possible sequel to human 
 vaccines, too, since the Salk polio vaccine 
 was said to carry a monkey retrovirus (from 
 cultivating the vaccine on monkey organs) 
 that produces inheritable cancer. The monkey 
 retrovirus SV40 keeps turning up in human 
 cancer sites.
 It is also widely acknowledged 
 that vaccines can cause a fast-acting, 
 usually fatal, disease called autoimmune 
 haemolytic anaemia (AIHA). Without treatment, 
 and frequently with treatment, individuals 
 can die in agony within a matter of days. 
 Merck, itself a multinational vaccine 
 manufacturer, states in The Merck Manual of 
 Diagnosis and Therapy that autoimmune 
 haemolytic anaemia may be caused by modified 
 live-virus vaccines, as do Tizard's 
 Veterinary Immunology (4th edition) and the 
 Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.(6) 
 The British Government's Working Group, 
 despite being staffed by vaccine-industry 
 consultants who say they are independent, 
 also acknowledged this fact. However, no one 
 warns the pet owners before their animals are 
 subjected to an unnecessary booster, and very 
 few owners are told why after their pets die 
 of AIHA.
 A Wide Range of Vaccine-induced 
 Diseases
 We also found some worrying 
 correlations between vaccine events and the 
 onset of arthritis in our 1997 survey. Our 
 concerns were compounded by research in the 
 human field.
 The New England Journal of 
 Medicine, for example, reported that it is 
 possible to isolate the rubella virus from 
 affected joints in children vaccinated 
 against rubella. It also told of the 
 isolation of viruses from the peripheral 
 blood of women with prolonged arthritis 
 following vaccination. (7)
 Then, in 2000, CHC's findings 
 were confirmed by research which showed that 
 polyarthritis and other diseases like 
 amyloidosis, which affects organs in dogs, 
 were linked to the combined vaccine given to 
 dogs.(8) There is a huge body of research, 
 despite the paucity of funding from the 
 vaccine industry, to confirm that vaccines 
 can cause a wide range of brain and central 
 nervous system damage. Merck itself states in 
 its Manual that vaccines (i.e., its own 
 products) can cause encephalitis: brain 
 inflammation/ damage. In some cases, 
 encephalitis involves lesions in the brain 
 and throughout the central nervous system. 
 Merck states that "examples are the 
 encephalitides following measles, chickenpox, 
 rubella, smallpox vaccination, vaccinia, and 
 many other less well defined viral 
 infections".
 When the dog owners who took 
 part in the CHC survey reported that their 
 dogs developed short attention spans, 73.1% 
 of the dogs did so within three months of a 
 vaccine event. The same percentage of dogs 
 was diagnosed with epilepsy within three 
 months of a shot (but usually within days). 
 We also found that 72.5% of dogs that were 
 considered by their owners to be nervous and 
 of a worrying disposition, first exhibited 
 these traits within the three-month 
 post-vaccination period.
 I would like to add for the 
 sake of Oliver, my friend who suffered from 
 paralysed rear legs and death shortly after a 
 vaccine shot, that "paresis" is listed in 
 Merck's Manual as a symptom of encephalitis. 
 This is defined as muscular weakness of a 
 neural (brain) origin which involves partial 
 or incomplete paralysis, resulting from 
 lesions at any level of the descending 
 pathway from the brain. Hind limb paralysis 
 is one of the potential consequences. 
 Encephalitis, incidentally, is a disease that 
 can manifest across the scale from mild to 
 severe and can also cause sudden death.
 Organ failure must also be 
 suspected when it occurs shortly after a 
 vaccine event. Dr Larry Glickman, who 
 spearheaded the Purdue research into 
 post-vaccination biochemical changes in dogs, 
 wrote in a letter to Cavalier Spaniel breeder 
 Bet Hargreaves:
 "Our ongoing studies of dogs 
 show that following routine vaccination, 
 there is a significant rise in the level of 
 antibodies dogs produce against their own 
 tissues. Some of these antibodies have been 
 shown to target the thyroid gland, connective 
 tissue such as that found in the valves of 
 the heart, red blood cells, DNA, etc. I do 
 believe that the heart conditions in Cavalier 
 King Charles Spaniels could be the end result 
 of repeated immunisations by vaccines 
 containing tissue culture contaminants that 
 cause a progressive immune response directed 
 at connective tissue in the heart valves. The 
 clinical manifestations would be more 
 pronounced in dogs that have a genetic 
 predisposition [although] the findings should 
 be generally applicable to all dogs 
 regardless of their breed."
 I must mention here that Dr 
 Glickman believes that vaccines are a 
 necessary evil, but that safer vaccines need 
 to be developed.
 Meanwhile, please join the 
 queue to place your dog, cat, horse and child 
 on the Russian roulette wheel because a 
 scientist says you should.
 Vaccines Stimulate an 
 Inflammatory Response
 The word "allergy" is 
 synonymous with "sensitivity" and 
 "inflammation" . It should, by rights, also be 
 synonymous with the word "vaccination" . This 
 is what vaccines do: they sensitise (render 
 allergic)an individual in the process of 
 forcing them to develop antibodies to fight a 
 disease threat. In other words, as is 
 acknowledged and accepted, as part of the 
 vaccine process the body will respond with 
 inflammation. This may be apparently 
 temporary or it may be longstanding.
 Holistic doctors and 
 veterinarians have known this for at least 
 100 years.
 They talk about a wide range of 
 inflammatory or "-itis" diseases which Adminse 
 shortly after a vaccine event. Vaccines, in 
 fact, plunge many individuals into an 
 allergic state. Again, this is a disorder 
 that ranges from mild all the way through to 
 the suddenly fatal. Anaphylactic shock is the 
 culmination: it's where an individual has a 
 massive allergic reaction to a vaccine and 
 will die within minutes if adrenaline or its 
 equivalent is not administered.
 There are some individuals who 
 are genetically not well placed to withstand 
 the vaccine challenge. These are the people 
 (and animals are "people", too) who have 
 inherited faulty B and T cell function. B and 
 T cells are components within the immune 
 system which identify foreign invaders and 
 destroy them, and hold the invader in memory 
 so that they cannot cause future harm. 
 However, where inflammatory responses are 
 concerned, the immune system overreacts and 
 causes unwanted effects such as allergies and 
 other
 inflammatory conditions.
 Merck warns in its Manual that 
 patients with, or from families with, B 
 and/or T cell immunodeficiencies should not 
 receive live-virus vaccines due to the risk 
 of severe or fatal infection. Elsewhere, it 
 lists features of B and T cell 
 immunodeficiencies as food allergies, 
 inhalant allergies, eczema, dermatitis, 
 neurological deterioration and heart disease. 
 To translate, people with these conditions 
 can die if they receive live-virus vaccines. 
 Their immune systems are simply not competent 
 enough to guarantee a healthy reaction to the 
 viral assault from modified live-virus 
 vaccines.
 Modified live-virus (MLV) 
 vaccines replicate in the patient until an 
 immune response is provoked. If a defence 
 isn't stimulated, then the vaccine continues 
 to replicate until it gives the patient the 
 very disease it was intending to prevent.
 Alternatively, a deranged 
 immune response will lead to inflammatory 
 conditions such as arthritis, pancreatitis, 
 colitis, encephalitis and any number of 
 autoimmune diseases such as cancer and 
 leukaemia, where the body attacks its own 
 cells.
 A new theory, stumbled upon by 
 Open University student Gary Smith, explains 
 what holistic practitioners have been saying 
 for a very long time. Here is what a few of 
 the holistic vets have said in relation to 
 their patients:
 Dr Jean Dodds: "Many 
 veterinarians trace the present problems with 
 allergic and immunologic diseases to the 
 introduction of MLV vaccines..." (9)
 Christina Chambreau, DVM: 
 "Routine vaccinations are probably the worst 
 thing that we do for our animals. They cause 
 all types of illnesses, but not directly to 
 where we would relate them definitely to be 
 caused by the vaccine." (10)
 Martin Goldstein, DVM: "I think 
 that vaccines...are leading killers of dogs 
 and cats in America today."
 Dr Charles E. Loops, DVM: 
 "Homoeopathic veterinarians and other 
 holistic practitioners have maintained for 
 some time that vaccinations do more harm than 
 they provide benefits." (12)
 Mike Kohn, DVM: "In response to 
 this [vaccine] violation, there have been 
 increased autoimmune diseases (allergies 
 being one component), epilepsy, neoplasia 
 [tumours], as well as behavioural problems in 
 small animals." (13)
 A Theory on Inflammation
 Gary Smith explains what 
 observant healthcare practitioners have been 
 saying for a very long time, but perhaps 
 they've not understood why their observations 
 led them to say it. His theory, incidentally, 
 is causing a huge stir within the inner 
 scientific sanctum. Some believe that his 
 theory could lead to a cure for many diseases 
 including cancer. For me, it explains why the 
 vaccine process is inherently questionable.
 Gary was learning about 
 inflammation as part of his studies when he 
 struck upon a theory so extraordinary that it 
 could have implications for the treatment of 
 almost every inflammatory disease -- 
 including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, 
 rheumatoid arthritis and even HIV and AIDS.
 Gary 's theory questions the 
 received wisdom that when a person gets ill, 
 the inflammation that occurs around the 
 infected area helps it to heal. He claims 
 that, in reality, inflammation prevents the 
 body from recognising a foreign substance and 
 therefore serves as a hiding place for 
 invaders. The inflammation occurs when 
 at-risk cells produce receptors called All 
 (known as angiotensin II type I receptors). 
 He says that while At1 has a balancing 
 receptor, At2, which is supposed to switch 
 off the inflammation, in most diseases this 
 does not happen.
 "Cancer has been described as 
 the wound that never heals," he says. "All 
 successful cancers are surrounded by 
 inflammation. Commonly this is thought to be 
 the body's reaction to try to fight the 
 cancer, but this is not the case.
 "The inflammation is not the 
 body trying to fight the infection. It is 
 actually the virus or bacteria deliberately 
 causing inflammation in order to hide from 
 the immune system [author's emphasis]." (14)
 If Gary is right, then the 
 inflammatory process so commonly stimulated 
 by vaccines is not, as hitherto assumed, a 
 necessarily acceptable sign. Instead, it 
 could be a sign that the viral or bacterial 
 component, or the adjuvant (which, containing 
 foreign protein, is seen as an invader by the 
 immune system), in the vaccine is winning by 
 stealth.
 If Gary is correct in believing 
 that the inflammatory response is not 
 protective but a sign that invasion is taking 
 place under cover of darkness, vaccines are 
 certainly not the friends we thought they 
 were. They are undercover assassins working 
 on behalf of the enemy, and vets and medical 
 doctors are unwittingly acting as 
 collaborators. Worse, we animal guardians and 
 parents are actually paying doctors and vets 
 to unwittingly betray our loved ones.
 Potentially, vaccines are the 
 stealth bomb of the medical world. They are 
 used to catapult invaders inside the castle 
 walls where they can wreak havoc, with none 
 of us any the wiser. So rather than 
 experiencing frank viral diseases such as the 
 'flu, measles, mumps and rubella (and, in the 
 case of dogs, parvovirus and distemper), we 
 are allowing the viruses to win anyway - but 
 with cancer, leukaemia and other inflammatory 
 or autoimmune (self-attacking) diseases 
 taking their place.
 The Final Insult
 All 27 veterinary schools in 
 North America have changed their protocols 
 for vaccinating dogs and cats along the 
 following lines; (15) however, vets in 
 practice are reluctant to listen to these 
 changed protocols and official veterinary 
 bodies in the UK and other countries are 
 ignoring the following facts.
 Dogs' and cats' immune systems 
 mature fully at six months. If modified 
 live-virus vaccine is giver after six months 
 of age, it produces immunity, which is good 
 for the life of the pet. If another MLV 
 vaccine is given a year later, the antibodies 
 from the first vaccine neutralise the 
 antigens of the second vaccine and there is 
 little or no effect. The litre is no 
 "boosted", nor are more memory cells induced.
 Not only are annual boosters 
 unnecessary, but they subject the pet to 
 potential risks such as allergic reactions 
 and immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia.
 In plain language, veterinary 
 schools in America , plus the American 
 Veterinary Medical Association, have looked 
 at studies to show how long vaccines last and 
 they have concluded and announced that annual 
 vaccination is unnecessary. (16-19)
 Further, they have acknowledged 
 that vaccines are not without harm. Dr Ron 
 Schultz, head of pathobiology at Wisconsin 
 University and a leading light in this field, 
 has been saying this politely to his 
 veterinary colleagues since the 1980s. I've 
 been saying it for the past 12 years. But 
 change is so long in coming and, in the 
 meantime, hundreds of thousands of animals 
 are dying every year - unnecessarily.
 The good news is that thousands 
 of animal lovers (but not enough) have heard 
 what we've been saying. Canine Health Concern 
 members around the world use real food as 
 Nature's supreme disease preventative, 
 eschewing processed pet food, and minimise 
 the vaccine risk. Some of us, myself 
 included, have chosen not to vaccinate our 
 pets at all. Our reward is healthy and 
 long-lived dogs.
 It has taken but one paragraph 
 to tell you the good and simple news. The 
 gratitude I feel each day, when I embrace my 
 healthy dogs, stretches from the centre of 
 the Earth to the Universe and beyond.
 About the Author:
 Catherine O'Driscoll runs 
 Canine Health Concern which campaigns and 
 also delivers an educational program, the 
 Foundation in Canine Healthcare. She is 
 author of Shock to the System (2005; see 
 review this issue), the best-selling book 
 What Vets Don't Tell You About Vaccines 
 (1997, 1998), and Who Killed the Darling Buds 
 of May? (1997; reviewed in NEXUS 4/04).
 She lives in Scotland with 
 her partner, Rob Ellis, and three Golden 
 Retrievers, named Edward, Daniel and Gwinnie, 
 and she lectures on canine health around the 
 world.
 For more information, contact 
 Catherine O'Driscoll at Canine Health 
 Concern, PO Box 7533 , Perth PH2 1AD , 
 Scotland , UK , email catherine@carsegray .co.uk 
 , website 
http://www.canine- health-concern. org.uk.
 Shock to the System is 
 available in the UK from CHC, and worldwide 
 from Dogwise at http://www.dogwise. com.
 Endnotes
 1. "Effects of Vaccination on 
 the Endocrine and Immune Systems of Dogs, 
 Phase II", Purdue University , November 
 1,1999, at 
http://www.homestea d.com/vonhapsbur g/haywardstudyon vaccines. html.
 2. See 
 www.vet.purdue. edu/epi/gdhstudy .htm.
 3. See 
http://www.avma. org/vafstf/ default.asp.
 4. Veterinary Products 
 Committee (VPC) Working Group on Feline and 
 Canine Vaccination, DEFRA, May 2001.
 5. JVM Series A 50(6):286-291, 
 August 2003.
 6. Duval, D. and Giger,U. 
 (1996). "Vaccine-Associated Immune-Mediated 
 Hemolytic Anemia in the Dog", Journal of 
 Veterinary Internal Medicine 10:290-295.
 7. New England Journal of 
 Medicine, vol.313,1985.
 See also Clin Exp Rheumatol 
 20(6):767-71, Nov-Dec 2002.
 8. Am Coll Vet Intern Med 
 14:381,2000.
 9. Dodds, Jean W.,DVM, "Immune 
 System and Disease Resistance", at 
http://www.critterc hat.net/immune. htm.
 10. Wolf Clan magazine, 
 April/May 1995.
 11. Goldstein, Martin, The 
 Nature of Animal Healing, Borzoi/Alfred A. 
 Knopf, Inc., 1999.
 12. Wolf Clan magazine, op. 
 cit.
 13. ibid.
 14. Journal of Inflammation 
 1:3,2004, at 
http://www.journal- inflammation. com 
 content/1/1/ 3.
 15. Klingborg, D.J., Hustead, 
 D.R. and Curry-Galvin, E. et al., "AVMA 
 Council on Biologic and Therapeutic Agents' 
 report on cat and dog vaccines", Journal of 
 the American Veterinary Medical Association 
 221(10):1401- 1407, November 15,2002,
http://www.avma. org/policies/ vaccination. htm.
 16. ibid.
 17. Schultz, R.D., "Current and 
 future canine and feline vaccination 
 programs", Vet Med 93:233-254,1998.
 18. Schultz, R.D., Ford, R.B., 
 Olsen, J. and Scott, P., "Titer testing and 
 vaccination: a new look at traditional 
 practices", Vet Med 97:1-13, 2002 (insert).
 19. Twark, L. and Dodds, W.J., 
 "Clinical application of serum parvovirus and 
 distemper virus antibody liters for 
 determining revaccination strategies in 
 healthy dogs", J Am Vet Med Assoc 
 217:1021-1024, 2000.
 Guest Book Table of Contents 
 Contacts
 Classes 101 Organization List If 
 You Suspect an Adverse Reaction
 Moxidectin Section DOGS Editorial 
 NSAID Section
 Moxidectin List Changing Times 
 NSAID List
 Six Month Injection 
 Arthritis/Pain Medication
 Other Survivors/Memorials
 Vaccine Section Veterinarian Oath 
 Miscellaneous Warnings
 Vaccine Survivors/Memorials DOGS 
 Info Links Our Mission
 Flea Products DOGS Good Reading 
 Award Page
 Who Am I?. Puppy Mills Newsletter 
 Archive .
 judy&kids
i'm very confused
so after the first series of distemper, dewormer and rabies shot, that is over? no need to do yearly distemper and the next rabies shot which will last 3 yrs?
this issue have come up many times so it is still confusing.
and my vet said that these shots are necessary. I really don't know. all my kids stay inside and don't set a foot outside and I do the distemper and rabies only. 1st rabies shot last for one year, 2nd shot lasts 3 year and the 3rd shot lasts for 7 years. only the distemper was a yearly booster. maybe I'll go every 2 yrs for the distemper.
I encourage you to continue reading and talking with your vet
The article is interesting and lists supporting documents/tests but remember that this is still not the majority view of the AVMA, and probably not your veterinarian. There IS acceptance that too many vaccines in general are given and that the individual dog's immune response may be sufficient to last its lifetime after only one or two immunizations but only titer testing can tell that, so to just stop after the first set of puppy vacs is dicey and something I wouldn't feel comfortable doing. Still, I don't give more than the absolute minimum (I don't give corona, bordatella, lyme and others that don't relate to my location or dog's lifestyle <homebody>)...but I do keep up on rabies because its legally required and I want to be able to take my dog out in public as I wish, and in the very unlikely chance he would nip at a vet or technician I want them protected too.

I agree with the statement in the article that said too many vets look upon annual vaccinations as an income producing item and now that most all vaccines are designed to last 3yrs, that is criminal in my mind! Perhaps more discussion with your own vet on his/her philosophy is called for...but YOU have the final choice...and the final responsibility to your dog and your community as well.
the more I read about vaccines,
the less I want to give! Already I stretch out the 'annuals' to 18 months and then stop giving anything except Bordetella after age 6.
Even a seminar that Iams gave (DVD shown at a Club meeting last year) recommends an abrevated protocol. I'm so glad my Vet respects my feelings on this.